Assignment Criteria |
Exceptional
Outstanding or highest level of performance |
Exceeds
Very good or high level of performance |
Meets
Competent or satisfactory level of performance |
Needs Improvement
Poor or failing level of performance |
Developing
Unsatisfactory level of performance |
|
Content Possible Points = 140 Points |
|
Introduction |
20 Points |
18 Points |
16 Points |
14 Points |
0 Points |
|
Introduction presents a brief overview all parts of the paper. |
Introduction presents one of the two required elements. |
Introduction does not include either of the two required elements. |
Minimal attempt at introduction. |
No introduction is present.
|
|
Selects relevant HealthIT Topic to discuss; provides rationale for selecting topic |
30 Points |
26 Points |
24 Points |
21 Points |
0 Points |
|
Successfully selects relevant HealthIT Topic to discuss; provides rationale for selecting topic |
Selects relevant HealthIT Topic to discuss; provides minimal rationale for selecting topic |
Selects HealthIT Topic to discuss; not related to practice; provides minimal rationale for selecting topic |
Selects HealthIT Topic to discuss; not related to practice; provides no rationale for selecting topic |
Does not complete assignment |
|
Convincing arguments of how topic will impact practice in a positive or negative manner citing pros and cons. |
40 Points |
36 Points |
32 Points |
|
0 Points |
|
Provides convincing arguments of how topic will impact practice in a positive or negative manner -pros and cons presented. |
Some arguments of how topic will impact practice in a positive or negative manner -pros and cons presented, but are not convincing in nature. |
Minimal arguments of how topic will impact practice in a positive or negative manner -pros and cons presented. |
|
No discussion of positive or negative impact presented |
|
|
30 points |
26 points |
24 points |
|
0 Points |
|
Discussion of how informatics skills and knowledge were used in the process relevance to developing the assignment |
Discussion of how informatics skills and knowledge were used in the process relevance to developing the assignment is presented |
Some discussion of how informatics skills and knowledge were used in the process relevance to developing the assignment. |
Minimal discussion of how informatics skills and knowledge were used presented |
|
No discussion of how informatics skills and knowledge were used |
|
Conclusion |
20 Points |
18 Points |
16 Points |
14 Points |
0 Points |
|
Concluding statements summarize insights about the key elements of the paper gained during the assignment. Recommendations for the future are provided |
Provides a summary of key points and a partial summary of insights gained during the assignment. Includes some recommendations for future related to topic. |
Concluding statements are present but do not address insights and/or includes minimal recommendations for future related to topic
|
Minimal concluding statements present but no insight or recommendations for future are presented. |
No conclusion.
|
|
Content Subtotal_____/140 Points |
|
|
|
Minimal concluding statement. |
Format Possible Points = 35 Points |
|
APA Style |
20 Points |
18 Points |
16 Points |
14 Points |
0 Points |
|
0–1 APA format errors in text, title, body of paper, summary and reference page(s) are completely consistent with APA format. |
2-3 APA format errors in text, title page, body of paper, summary and reference page(s) are completely consistent with APA format. |
4-6 APA format errors in text, title page, in text, title page, body of paper, summary and reference page(s) are completely consistent with APA format. |
7-9 APA format errors in text, title page, in text, title page, body of paper, summary and reference page(s) are completely consistent with APA format |
10 or more APA format errors in text, title page, in text, title page, body of paper, summary and reference page(s) are completely consistent with APA format. |
|
Citations |
8 Points |
7 Points |
6 Points |
4 Points |
0 Points |
|
0–1 errors in identifying ideas, and information from other sources are cited correctly. There are a minimum of three scholarly, current (5 years or less) references. |
2-3 errors in identifying ideas, and information from other sources are cited.
|
4-6 errors in identifying ideas, and information from other sources are cited.
|
7-9 errors in identifying ideas, and information from other sources are cited.
|
10 or more errors in identifying ideas, and information from other sources are cited.
|
|
Writing Mechanics |
7 Points |
6 Points |
5 Points |
3 Points |
0 Points |
|
0–3 errors in grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other elements of formal academic writing |
4–5 errors in grammar, spelling, word usage,
punctuation, and other elements of formal academic writing
|
6-7 errors in grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other elements of formal academic writing
|
8-9 errors in grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other elements of formal academic writing
|
10 or more errors in grammar, spelling,
word usage, punctuation, and other elements of formal academic writing. |
|
Format Subtotal_____/35 Points |
|
|
|
8–9 errors in grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other elements of formal academic writing
|
Total Points____/175 Points |
|
|
|