Social Media use and cyber civility guidelines in U.S. Nursing Schools: A review of websites

Journal Quantitative Article Critique Journal Quantitative Article Critique Rubrik Guide Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Introduction, Thesis Statement, & Statement of the Problem • Presents the topic for the paper along with your position. • Clearly defines the study's clinical problem or issue. • Thesis coherently developed and maintained throughout. • Note the significance of the problem in terms of the scope, severity, and relevance of the problem. • Identify if the approach to addressing the clinical issue is effective. 5.0 to >0.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks 5.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Identification of Hypothesis and/or Research Questions • Pinpoint the article’s hypothesis and/or research questions. • Determine if the hypothesis and/or research questions proved true or disapproved. Explain the response in detail. • Indicate if there are any objectives/aims to test the hypothesis and/or research questions. 10.0 to >0.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Appraisal of the Studies Literature • Justify if the author's synthesis literature relevant to the clinical problem or issue. • Discuss the literature review provided by the author/s. • Acknowledge any key discoveries, outcomes, and patterns within the author/s’ literature review. 10.0 to >0.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentification of Theoretical Framework • Name and describe the theoretical framework chosen by the author/s. • Remark on the appropriateness of theory to the clinical problem. o Does the theoretical framework specify key variables, assumptions, and phenomena of interest relating to the clinical problem? 5.0 to >0.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks 5.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResearch Design • Confirm whether or not the research design is appropriate to the research question. • Review the methodology to determine if there are potential sources of bias. 5.0 to >0.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks 5.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePopulation and Sample • Record the sample population type and if the population is described sufficiently. • List the sample size and if it is adequate. (i.e., was a power analysis used to estimate the sample size) • Assess the selection criteria for acquiring the sample population. • Provide information on the sample population inclusion and exclusion criteria. 10.0 to >0.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProtection of Human Rights • Explain any conflicts of interest. • Clarify the informed consent process and/or other ethical permissions for the research study. • Disclose information on whether the autonomy and confidentiality of participants were met. • Note whether the procedure was in place to safeguard the rights of study participants. • Remark on whether the study minimized risks to study participants. 5.0 to >0.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks 5.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome-procedures • Indicate if the intervention is described and implemented appropriately. • Identify if the research staff was trained properly to collect the data. 5.0 to >0.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks 5.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeData Collection & Measurement • Examine the tools/instruments used in the study. o Type of tool (i.e., questionnaire, observation, checklist, etc.) o Validity and reliability of the tool. o A listing of the data collected/measured by the tool. o, Are the tools/instrument described well and good choices to study the clinical problem? • Specify the independent and dependent variables. Be sure to note which ones are being measured. • Establish if the measurements (statistical data) is accurate and valid. • Remark on whether the measurements (statistical data) are relevant to the hypothesis and/or research questions. 10.0 to >0.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks 10.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeData Analysis & Results o Do the findings link back to the author/s’ literature review? o Is the hypothesis and/or research questions supported by the findings? o What are the strengths and weakness of the study? o Are the findings adequately summarized, with good use of tables and figures? o Are findings reported in a manner that facilitates a meta-analysis and with sufficient information needed for evidence-based practice? o Are the results and/or study conclusions valid based on the data analysis? • Implications for Practice o Is the study generalizable to other population or can it be repeated in another study with similar results? o Are there any recommendations for future research? o Do the author/s discuss the study implications for clinical practice? 15.0 to >0.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks 15.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePersonal Reflection Should Answer the Following: • How does the article contribute to your understanding of research? • Does the article change your views of the topic? • What do you consider to be the strengths and weaknesses of the article? 5.0 to >0.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks 5.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFaculty Only - Title Page, Abstract & Paper Formatting • Meets the standards set by APA 7th edition. • Abstract formatting is correct under APA 7th edition guidelines. • Abstract is between 150-250 words and contains a keywords section. • Abstract provides a brief synopsis of the paper, inclusive of the problem statement. • No running header as noted for student papers under APA 7th edition. • Correct use of level 1-4 headers as noted in the APA 7th edition manual. • The paper has page numbers located in the upper right margin within the header section. 3.0 to >0.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks 3.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFaculty Only - In-text Citations & Reference Page • Uses sources effectively and documents sources accurately with minimal errors. • Limits the use of direct quotes. Ideally, no more than 2 or 3. • Meets reference requirements for assignment. • Reference list is in correct format. 4.0 to >0.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks 4.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFaculty Only - Mechanics & Syntax • Well-developed sentence structure with minimal errors in punctuation, spelling or grammar. • Appropriate margins and font. • Correct application of research style format. • Use of professional active voice writing rather than passive voice. • Skillful use of language with varied, accurate vocabulary. 3.0 to >0.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks 3.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFaculty Only - Content Development & Organization • Provides a thorough explanation of key idea(s) at an appropriate level for the target audience. • Demonstrates critical thinking with excellent understanding of the topic. • Essentially the paper flows well, is easy to understand, and does not leave the audience with questions due to incomplete development. • The paper is organized well with clear focus and excellent transition between paragraphs. • There is a logical order to presentation of information. • Paragraphs are well-organized by topic, not to lengthy, and easy to understand. 5.0 to >0.0 pts Full Marks 0.0 pts No Marks 5.0 pts Total Points: 100.0 MSN 602 Quant Article Social media use and cybercivility guidelines in U.S. nursing schools_ A review of websites (2) (1).pdf DeGagne, J., Yamane, S., Conklin, J., Chang, J., & Kang, H. (2018). Social media use and cybercivility guidelines in U.S. nursing schools: A review of websites. Journal of Professional Nursing, 34, 35-41. This can be accessed at MSN 602 Quant Article Social media use and cybercivility guidelines in U.S. nursing schools_ A review of websites (2).pdf

ANSWER. PAPER DETAILS
Academic Level	Masters
Subject Area	Nursing
Paper Type	Article Critique
Number of Pages	6 Page(s)/1650 words
Sources	5
Format	APA 6
Spacing	Double Spacing

---

Reload

If this is not the paper you were searching for, you can order your 100% plagiarism free, custom written paper now!