The discussion demonstrates a limited understanding of how the candidate is able to evaluate current primary research and apply concepts to the nursing practice, using the given points, or the discussion does not include all of the given points. Or the discussion is illogical or poorly supported.

ANSWER. PAPER DETAILS
Academic Level	Masters
Subject Area	Nursing
Paper Type	Reflective Essay
Number of Pages	5 Page(s)/1375 words
Sources	4
Paper Format	APA
Spacing	Double Spaced

If the sample didn't load click the reload button below

If this is not the paper you were searching for, you can order your 100% plagiarism free, custom written paper now!

Price: $20.00

A.
A1. CREATION OF PROFESSIONAL MISSION STATEMENT	A professional mission statement is not provided, or the statement contains none of the required elements.	The professional mission statement ineffectively addresses the required elements, or the statement is disorganized or illogical.	The professional mission statement effectively addresses the required elements, and the statement is well organized and logical.
A1a. REFLECTION OF PROFESSIONAL MISSION STATEMENT	A reflection is not provided, or it makes no reference to how a professional mission statement will help guide the candidate’s nursing career.	The reflection ineffectively addresses how a professional mission statement will help guide the candidate’s nursing career, or the reflection is poorly reasoned or vague.	The reflection effectively addresses how a professional mission statement will help guide the candidate’s nursing career, and the reflection is well reasoned and sufficiently detailed.
A2a. PORTFOLIO REPRESENTATION OF A LEARNER AND HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL	The submission does not include an explanation, or the explanation makes no reference to the representation of the portfolio.	The submission includes an inadequate explanation of how either specific artifacts or completed work or both in the portfolio represent the candidate as a learner and a healthcare professional, or the explanation is illogical or poorly supported.	The submission includes an adequate explanation of how either specific artifacts or completed work or both in the portfolio represent the candidate as a learner and a healthcare professional, and the explanation is logical and well supported.
A2b. PORTFOLIO PROFESSIONAL STRENGTHS	A discussion is not provided, or it makes no reference to how the specific artifacts in the portfolio represent professional strengths.	The discussion illogically addresses how the specific artifacts in the portfolio represent professional strengths, or the discussion is vague.	The discussion logically addresses how the specific artifacts in the portfolio represent professional strengths, and the discussion is sufficiently detailed.
A2c. PROGRAM PROGRESSION CHALLENGES	The submission does not include a discussion, or the discussion makes no references to the challenges encountered during the progression of the program.	The submission includes an inadequate discussion of the challenges encountered during the progression of the program, or the discussion is illogical or poorly supported.	The submission includes an adequate discussion of the challenges encountered during the progression of the program, and the discussion is logical and well supported.
A2ci. OVERCOME CHALLENGES	An explanation was not provided, or it makes no reference to how the given challenges were overcome.	The explanation ineffectively addresses how the given challenges were overcome, or the explanation is poorly reasoned, poorly supported, or vague.	The explanation effectively addresses how the given challenges were overcome, and the explanation is well reasoned, well supported, and sufficiently detailed.
A2d. PROGRAM OUTCOMES	An explanation was not provided, or it makes no reference to how the coursework helped the candidate meet each of the 9 nursing program outcomes.	The explanation ineffectively addresses how the coursework helped the candidate meet each of the 9 nursing program outcomes, or the explanation is poorly reasoned, poorly supported, or vague.	The explanation successfully addresses how the coursework helped the candidate meet each of the 9 nursing program outcomes, and the explanation is well reasoned, well supported, and sufficiently detailed.
A2e. ROLES DURING THE PROGRAM	An analysis is not provided, or it makes no reference to how the given roles were fulfilled during the program.	The analysis for how the given roles were fulfilled during the program is illogical, unconvincing, or ineffective.	The analysis for how the given roles were fulfilled during the program is logical, convincing, and effective.
A2f. PROFESSIONAL GROWTH	A discussion is not provided, or it makes no reference to how the candidate has grown professionally since the beginning of the program.	The discussion ineffectively addresses how the candidate has grown professionally since the beginning of the program, or the discussion is illogical or poorly supported.	The discussion effectively addresses how the candidate has grown professionally since the beginning of the program, and the discussion is logical and well supported.
B1. QUALITY AND SAFETY: REFLECTION	A reflection is not provided, or it makes no reference to the professional definition of quality and safety.	The reflection ineffectively addresses how the professional definition of quality and safety was developed in Professional Roles and Values, or it does not include necessary changes. Or the reflection is poorly reasoned or vague.	The reflection effectively addresses how the professional definition of quality and safety was developed in Professional Roles and Values, including necessary changes to the definition, and the reflection is well reasoned and sufficiently detailed.
B1a. QUALITY AND SAFETY: DEVELOPMENT OF PROFESSIONAL DEFINITION	A discussion is not provided, or it makes no reference to how the program assisted in developing the candidate’s professional definition of quality and safety.	The discussion illogically addresses how the program assisted in developing the candidate’s professional definition of quality and safety, or the discussion is poorly supported.	The discussion logically addresses how the program assisted in developing the candidate’s professional definition of quality and safety, and the discussion is well supported.
B1b. QUALITY AND SAFETY: ARTIFACT SUPPORT	Artifacts in the portfolio that support the professional definition of quality and safety are not identified.	The identified portfolio artifacts are inappropriate, or they do not support the professional definition of quality and safety.	The identified portfolio artifacts are appropriate, and they support the professional definition of quality and safety.
B1bi. QUALITY AND SAFETY: ARTIFACTS SUPPORTING DEFINITION	An explanation was not provided, or it makes no reference to how the given artifacts support the definition from part B1.	The explanation ineffectively addresses how the given artifacts support the definition from part B1, or the explanation is illogical.	The explanation effectively addresses how the given artifacts support the definition from part B1, and the explanation is logical.
B2. QUALITY AND SAFETY: IMPORTANCE OF IHI CERTIFICATE	A discussion is not provided, or it makes no reference to the importance of the IHI certificate for the candidate’s future role as a professional nurse.	The discussion demonstrates a limited understanding of the importance the IHI certificate has on the candidate’s future role as a professional nurse, or the discussion is poorly supported or poorly reasoned.	The discussion demonstrates a sufficient understanding of the importance the IHI certificate has on the candidate’s future role as a professional nurse, and the discussion is well supported and well reasoned.
C1. EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE: REFLECTION	A reflection is not provided, or it makes no reference to the professional definition of evidence-based practice.	The reflection ineffectively addresses how the professional definition of an evidence-based practice was developed in Professional Roles and Values, or it does not include necessary changes to the definition. Or the reflection is poorly reasoned or vague.	The reflection effectively addresses how the professional definition of an evidence-based practice was developed in Professional Roles and Values, including necessary changes to the definition, and the reflection is well reasoned and sufficiently detailed.
C1a. EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE: DEVELOPMENT OF PROFESSIONAL DEFINITION	A discussion is not provided, or it makes no reference to how the program assisted in developing the candidate’s professional definition of evidence-based practice.	The discussion illogically addresses how the program assisted in developing the candidate’s professional definition of evidence-based practice, or the discussion is poorly supported.	The discussion logically addresses how the program assisted in developing the candidate’s professional definition of evidence-based practice, and the discussion is well supported.
C1b. EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE: ARTIFACT SUPPORT	Artifacts in the portfolio that support the professional definition of evidence-based practice are not identified.	The identified portfolio artifacts are inappropriate, or they do not support the professional definition of evidence-based practice.	The identified portfolio artifacts are appropriate, and they support the professional definition of evidence-based practice.
C1bi. EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE: ARTIFACTS SUPPORTING DEFINITION	An explanation was not provided, or it makes no reference to how the given artifacts support the definition from part C1.	The explanation ineffectively addresses how the given artifacts support the definition from part C1, or the explanation is illogical.	The explanation effectively addresses how the given artifacts support the definition from part C1, and the explanation is logical.
C2a. EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE: PRIMARY RESEARCH	A discussion is not provided, or it makes no reference to how the candidate is able to evaluate current primary research and apply concepts to the nursing practice, using the given points.	The discussion demonstrates a limited understanding of how the candidate is able to evaluate current primary research and apply concepts to the nursing practice, using the given points, or the discussion does not include all of the given points. Or the discussion is illogical or poorly supported.	The discussion demonstrates a sufficient understanding of how the candidate is able to evaluate current primary research and apply concepts to the nursing practice, and the discussion includes all of the given points. The discussion is logical and well supported.
C2b. EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE: ACHIEVEMENT IN EXCELLENCE	An explanation was not provided, or it makes no reference to how the candidate’s experience in the program helped achieve excellence in evidence-based practice.	The explanation ineffectively addresses how the candidate’s experience in the program helped achieve excellence in evidence-based practice, or the explanation is illogical or poorly supported.	The explanation effectively addresses how the candidate’s experience in the program helped achieve excellence in evidence-based practice, and the explanation is logical and well supported.
D1. APPLIED LEADERSHIP: REFLECTION	A reflection is not provided, or it makes no reference to the professional definition of applied leadership.	The reflection ineffectively addresses how the professional definition of applied leadership was developed in Professional Roles and Values, or it does not include necessary changes to the definition. Or the reflection is poorly reasoned or vague.	The reflection effectively addresses how the professional definition of applied leadership was developed in Professional Roles and Values, including necessary changes to the definition, and the reflection is well reasoned and sufficiently detailed.
D1a. APPLIED LEADERSHIP: DEVELOPMENT OF PROFESSIONAL DEFINITION	A discussion is not provided, or it makes no reference to how the program assisted in developing the candidate’s professional definition of applied leadership.	The discussion illogically addresses how the program assisted in developing the candidate’s professional definition of applied leadership, or the discussion is poorly supported.	The discussion logically addresses how the program assisted in developing the candidate’s professional definition of applied leadership, and the discussion is well supported.
D1b. APPLIED LEADERSHIP: ARTIFACT SUPPORT	Artifacts in the portfolio that support the professional definition of applied leadership are not identified.	The identified portfolio artifacts are inappropriate, or they do not support the professional definition of applied leadership.	The identified portfolio artifacts are appropriate, and they support the professional definition of applied leadership.
D1bi. . APPLIED LEADERSHIP: ARTIFACTS SUPPORTING DEFINITION	An explanation was not provided, or it makes no reference to how the given artifacts support the definition from part D1.	The explanation ineffectively addresses how the given artifacts support the definition from part D1, or the explanation is illogical.	The explanation effectively addresses how the given artifacts support the definition from part D1, and the explanation is logical.
D2a. APPLIED LEADERSHIP: PROFESSIONAL COLLABORATION	A discussion is not provided, or it makes no reference to the importance of professional collaboration for effective nursing leadership.	The discussion illogically addresses the importance of professional collaboration for effective nursing leadership, or the discussion is poorly supported.	The discussion logically addresses the importance of professional collaboration for effective nursing leadership, and the discussion is well supported.
E1. COMMUNITY AND POPULATION HEALTH: REFLECTION	A reflection is not provided, or it makes no reference to the professional definition of community and population health.	The reflection ineffectively addresses how the professional definition of community health was developed in Professional Roles and Values, or it does not include necessary changes to the definition. Or reflection is poorly reasoned or vague.	The reflection effectively addresses how the professional definition of community health was developed in Professional Roles and Values, including necessary changes to the definition, and the reflection is well reasoned and sufficiently detailed.
E1a. COMMUNITY AND POPULATION HEALTH: DEVELOPMENT OF PROFESSIONAL DEFINITION	A discussion is not provided, or it makes no reference to how the program assisted in developing the candidate’s professional definition of community and population health.	The discussion illogically addresses how the program assisted in developing the candidate’s professional definition of community and population health, or the discussion is poorly supported.	The discussion logically addresses how the program assisted in developing the candidate’s professional definition of community and population health, and the discussion is well supported.
E1b. COMMUNITY AND POPULATION HEALTH: ARTIFACT SUPPORT	Artifacts in the portfolio that support the professional definition of community and population health are not identified.	The identified portfolio artifacts are inappropriate, or they do not support the professional definition of community and population health.	The identified portfolio artifacts are appropriate, and they support the professional definition of community and population health.
E1bi. COMMUNITY AND POPULATION HEALTH: ARTIFACTS SUPPORTING DEFINITION	An explanation was not provided, or it makes no reference to how the given artifacts support the definition from part E1.	The explanation ineffectively addresses how the given artifacts support the definition from part E1, or the explanation is illogical.	The explanation effectively addresses how the given artifacts support the definition from part E1, and the explanation is logical.
E2a. COMMUNITY AND POPULATION HEALTH: COMMUNITY HEALTH TASK	A discussion is not provided, or it makes no reference to what was learned during the Community Health Nursing task.	The discussion provides vague, implausible examples of what was learned during the Community Health Nursing task, or the discussion is poorly supported or unclear.	The discussion provides specific, plausible examples of what was learned during the Community Health Nursing task, and the discussion is well supported and clear.
E2b. COMMUNITY AND POPULATION HEALTH: COMMUNITY DIAGNOSIS	A discussion is not provided, or it makes no reference to what was learned that led to the community diagnosis.	The discussion addresses what was learned that led to the community diagnosis, but it is poorly supported with vague or implausible examples.	The discussion addresses what was learned that led to the community diagnosis, and it is well supported with specific, plausible examples.
E2c. COMMUNITY AND POPULATION HEALTH: CHANGES IN FOCUS	A discussion is not provided, or it makes no reference to how the initial focus and diagnosis evolved after working with the population.	The discussion addresses how the initial focus and diagnosis evolved after working with the population, but the discussion is poorly supported with vague or implausible examples.	The discussion addresses the initial focus and diagnosis evolved after working with the population, and the discussion is well supported with specific, plausible examples.
E3. . COMMUNITY AND POPULATION HEALTH: IMPORTANCE OF AMNH CERTIFICATE	A discussion is not provided, or it makes no reference to the importance of the AMNH certificate for the candidate’s future role as a professional nurse.	The discussion demonstrates a limited understanding of the importance the AMNH certificate has on the candidate’s future role as a professional nurse, or the discussion is poorly supported or vague.	The discussion demonstrates a sufficient understanding of the importance the AMNH certificate has on the candidate’s future role as a professional nurse, and the discussion is well supported and sufficiently detailed.
F1. I will do
F2. I will do	.
F3. . I will do
F4. . I will do
F5. I will do
F6. . I will do		.
G. https://lrps.wgu.edu/provision/71484321	The submission does not include both in-text citations and a reference list for sources that are quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.	The submission includes in-text citations for sources that are quoted, paraphrased, or summarized, and a reference list; however, the citations and/or reference list is incomplete or inaccurate.	The submission includes in-text citations for sources that are properly quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and a reference list that accurately identifies the author, date, title, and source location as available.
H. https://lrps.wgu.edu/provision/27641407	Content is unstructured, is disjointed, or contains pervasive errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar. Vocabulary or tone is unprofessional or distracts from the topic.	Content is poorly organized, is difficult to follow, or contains errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar that cause confusion. Terminology is misused or ineffective.	Content reflects attention to detail, is organized, and focuses on the main ideas as prescribed in the task or chosen by the candidate. Terminology is pertinent, is used correctly, and effectively conveys the intended meaning. Mechanics, usage, and grammar promote accurate interpretation and understanding.

The discussion demonstrates a limited understanding of how the candidate is able to evaluate current primary research and apply concepts to the nursing practice, using the given points, or the discussion does not include all of the given points. Or the discussion is illogical or poorly supported.

ANSWER.

PAPER DETAILS

Item Details