How to write a critique on an article

Students are often tasked with writing a critique on an article , in which they are expected to analyze and react to a piece of academic writing. The primary objective is to analyze the work and determine the accuracy with which the author has interpreted its sources. Critiques evaluate the strength and persuasiveness of the author’s arguments in a piece of writing.

Critical thinking is the key to completing this paper successfully. Every researcher must persuade readers that their biased point of view is the correct one. Therefore, being able to research well, having the resources to separate reality from fiction, and exercising sound critical thinking are the only means to determine which arguments are more convincing.

How to critique an article

We’ve laid out a detailed guide below to help you write such a piece. Before we go any further, it’s important to note that the primary goal of a good article critique is to raise issues that determine whether or not an article under evaluation is correct or incorrect, just like you would do when writing a persuasive essay. The article critique we’ll discuss in this guide follows a slightly different style from the typical 5-paragraph essay, although both are effective at persuading readers of the integrity of your argument.

How to write a critical review of a journal article

This is a complex and perplexing type of job by its very nature. It’s understandable if students struggle to find the motivation to complete an article critique assignment.

To make your job easier, we have outlined a straightforward 3-step process of how to write a critique of a journal article

First, you should read the article.

Closely reading the paper is the first step in providing a compelling critique. Reading the piece can help you understand the material better, leading to more significant results. The following set of questions then demands answers:

The article’s author is widely regarded as an authority; why?

To what extent does the author’s work support the notion put out by the author?

To whom does this article cater?

In other words, how convincing are the claims made?

In what ways does the author’s argument contain logical fallacies?

Is it easy to understand, and does it make sense?

Is there a defined resolution to the story presented by the author?

Acquiring supporting evidence

Assess the author’s use of logic and define whether they are using formal logic

Look for prejudiced assumptions in the piece

Consider the author’s perspective when reading their interpretations of other authors’ works. Does this person implicitly assume unfavorable political attitudes towards opposing viewpoints?

Ensure you’re using the suitable sources

Comment on the article’s language

Just as an illustration,

Do not blindly accept the findings of scientific articles without questioning their research methods.

The third step: layout and presentation

How to write an analysis of an argument essay

A critique paper should be formatted and structured like any other academic document. Each article review has four main sections: introduction, overview, criticism, and summation. See the list below for a concise summary of the essential components of a well-structured paper

Introduction

• Author and article titles.
• The author’s main argument.
• It should have a separate thesis statement that represents the overall tone and focus of the analysis.

Summary

• What the article is mainly about.
• The article’s key points of argument.
• What follows is the article’s final analysis.
• Critique
• Point out the article’s positive and negative points.
• Respond with your informed opinion on the article’s usefulness, readability, and correctness. Use evidence from the text to back up your claims.

Conclusion

• Key ideas from the article are condensed for your convenience.
• Finish off your analysis by addressing the study’s significance.
• Explain why it would be beneficial to do additional research in this area if you believe the study to be applicable.

How to write a critical analysis of a research article

So, you have been tasked with composing a critical analysis of a journal article. The following is an outline of the steps involved in writing a critical review of a scholarly work

Amass some fundamental data.

• The structure of your paper is the same regardless of the topic of the article you’re critiquing.
• Review article title.
• Publication information, including journal name, issue number, and page range.
• Expounding on the piece’s central theme or difficulty.
• Details about the study’s goals, methodology, theoretical framework, and main findings.
• This data collection is the initial step.

Don’t just read the article once and move on.

Get a high-level understanding of it and an overview first. A well-written review will demonstrate that you have formed an informed opinion after reading the article. Developing a well-formed opinion requires a second reading of the material, this time with a critical eye, and marking key points that will prove valuable in writing your paper.

Use the evidence you gathered to write up your critique.

When critiquing a journal article, keep these things in mind.

Is the title of the article descriptive and accurate?

Is the abstract presented in the appropriate format, does it accurately summarize the paper, and does it contain sufficient detail?

Does what you set out to do in the introduction happen?

Have any of the author’s opinions or facts been incorrectly stated?

Is what we’re talking about important and timely?

Do the sources the author used hold any weight?

I was wondering whether you thought any of the following topics were hammered home a little too much or a little too little in

Do you think some parts need to be elaborated upon, simplified, or removed entirely?

Is the author clear in all of their statements?

Can you explain the author’s central beliefs?

How to write an article analysis paper

Below, we’ve highlighted the essential measures to take if you’re wondering how to criticize a research study.

In preparation for writing:

• Select a work that adheres to your instructor’s guidelines.
• To understand the article’s core points, read it in its entirety.
• Reread it, this time analyzing it.
• When you’re reading:

Explain the author’s expertise in the subject matter. In other words, what are the author’s qualifications?

Analyze the procedures that were followed to gather the data. Are the author’s approaches adequate and fruitful for addressing the specified research question(s)?

Take a look at the results and see what you think. Is there any evidence to suggest that these results can be applied to a broader population?

Take a close look at the article to see if it has any prejudice. Exist any potential biases or conflicts of interest?

Specify how high the quality of the research is. Do you think the article is current or dated?

Check the credibility of the information presented. Did the sources support their findings with relevant theory or prior literature?

Do you find it challenging to identify the positive and negative aspects that will inform your critique? If you need guidance on what to critique in each part of a research study, consider the following brief checklist.

Introduction

Problem

• Does the writer identify a problem?
• Is the scope of the problem statement appropriate?
• Is it possible to conduct studies on the given issue?
• Has the author established the context for the issue?
• Does the writer explain why this issue is so pressing?
• Can I find any discussion of variables and their associations in the text?
• Is the author adequately qualified to conduct this research?

Analyzing the current research

• Does it include all relevant studies?
• Is there a suitable citation for each source used?
• Is the author using primarily primary sources?
• Was there any evaluation, comparison, or contrast of the sources and their findings?
• Can the author defend the selection of sources used?
• Is there a logical progression to the literature review?
• Readers get enough information about the topic and the problem from the review.

Hypothesis

Do the author’s research questions and hypotheses appear clear?

Could every theory be put to the test?

Is there coherence between the hypotheses and the research questions?

Method

Participants

• Does the author give an idea of the size and primary features of the groups that made up the participants?
• Does the author describe its size and characteristics if a sample was taken?
• Is there a clear description of the sample selection procedure the author used?
• Is the author’s method of participant selection free of bias or restrictions?

Instruments

• What kinds of tools did the author employ?
• Have the right tools been used?
• Do the experimental devices adhere to standard safety procedures?
• Did the writer secure any necessary clearances before publishing?
• Is there a description of each instrument’s content, purpose, reliability, and validity?
• Is there a description of the development and validation processes for any instruments used in this study?

Architecture and methods

• Is there any description of the methodology employed?
• Is there a comprehensive explanation of all of their methods provided by the author?
• Is it possible to answer the posed question or problem using the proposed design and procedures?
• Are there reasonable connections between the steps?
• Is the proper technique and equipment being used?
• Is there a sufficient description of the setting in which the study was conducted?

Results

• How well-rounded were the author’s descriptive statistics?
• How many of the author’s hypotheses were tested?
• Has the author clarified the results of the qualitative study’s inductive reasoning?
• Can you make sense of the findings?
• Was there a supplementary data set that the author included? Would you say that they are clear, helpful, and well-structured?
• Are the data in the tables and figures also included in the text?

Organization of the piece

• Is there an effective system in place for completing the tasks? Is there a clear and consistent progression from headings to sections to subsections to paragraphs?
• Are the author’s style and reasoning straightforward, transparent, and logical?
• You’ll be ready to start putting pen to paper as soon as you’ve completed these procedures. Write a critical analysis of the research article you read, supporting your analysis with evidence from the article. To assist you in organizing your thoughts,

Here is a sample outline of the research critique for the article the effects of early education on children’s competence in elementary school:

The bibliographic details

• All three of these men, m. B. Bronson, d. E. Pierson, and t. Tivnan
• Title: how young children’s learning affects their success in primary school
• Initially released in 1984.
• Initially published in an evaluation review on how to write a critique on an article of the research

Do programs for young children have a lasting effect on children’s academic performance in primary school?

The ability to succeed in elementary school requires a wide range of skills.

The rate at which kids don’t have the bare-bones skills needed to succeed in second-grade drops when they participate in early childhood education programs, the hypothesis says.

Independent variable: participation in the Brookline early education program; controlled variable: mother’s level of education; dependent variables: mastery skills, social skills, and time use.

Methodology:

A quasi-experimental design involving a comparison group based solely on post-test scores and no randomization of participants.

Sampling:

A total of 169 students participated in the beep program for this research. Second graders were randomly chosen from the same classrooms and paired up based on gender. Children were also separated into groups: those who stayed in the beep program (104) and those who left but were followed (65).

To detect and monitor students’ mastery, social, and time use skills, the study’s authors utilized a custom-made instrument called the executive skill profile.

Data was gathered and analyzed during the spring of the student’s second-grade year (ethics/collection). Each child’s behavior was videotaped for six 10-minute intervals on separate days (spread out over three to six weeks). The time and number of times certain behaviors occurred were also noted.

Using a battery of assessments, the researchers looked for differences in children’s mastery, social, and time use abilities among matched pairs (those who were engaged in beep and those who moved elsewhere).

According to the study, kids who participated in beep improved their academic performance, self-control, and social skills. The students’ abilities to manage their time effectively did not improve noticeably. The early education program was effective across all three intervention tiers for children whose mothers have completed postsecondary education. Students whose mothers did not complete postsecondary education saw improvement in the same program only at the highest intensity level.

Conclusion

• Should you read the reviewed article?
• Do you see the logic in it?
• Consider the study’s findings: do they hold water? Explain.
• Is there relevance and application to the study’s scientific field?

How to write a critique of an essay and example

Now that you know the process for completing such an assignment, our legal writing services will provide you with a sample journal article critique to give you a sense of the end product.

An analysis of “exploring equity in Ontario” examining school districts’ equity policies across the province and institutions of higher learning “cannot address what it does not acknowledge.”

Knowing this, the Canadian province of Ontario developed a plan and set of guidelines to increase educational opportunities for all students. They have adopted an approach known as equity and inclusive education (i.e.) to bring about this change. Ontario’s eye strategy aims to eliminate bias, barriers, and power dynamics that limit students’ access to and success in the classroom. The first step administration can take to support their education system is to recognize a problem and commit to finding its solution. However, adequate consideration, investigation, and policy guideline

In conclusion

Despite its name, an article critique is not limited to providing constructive criticism. Any practical evaluation of a writing piece will incorporate effusive compliments and pointed criticism. To prevent being accused of plagiarism, use direct quotations when possible. Use third-person writing for the review. Make an effort to bring together the many aspects of your review and concentrate on the aspects of the author’s work that are most important to you, drawing connections between the researcher’s findings and your own experiences or the themes being covered in your class or you can get assistance at nursingpapersmarket.com.

PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH NURSING PAPERS MARKET TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT