Grand Canyon – NRS 437V Week 4 Assignment Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma (Part One)

NRS 437V Week 4 Assignment Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma (Part One)

NRS 437V Week 4 Complete

NRS437V

Week 4 DQ 1

Does the principle of autonomy guarantee a person the right to do something that is harmful to oneself? To others? Explain your response
with ethical rationale.

Week 4 DQ 2

What is the difference between beneficence and nonmaleficence? Give examples of each from your clinical practice.

NRS 437V Week 4 Assignment Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma (Part One)

Details:

Refer to the “Collaborative Learning Community:
Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma” resource for the dilemmas and resources that will be used for this multi-part Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma assignment. Part ONE is an individual assignment that will also be used in Part TWO, the culminating paper.

For this individual assignment, interview a hospital administrator, a spiritual leader, a health care colleague, or a neighbor/friend.
In your interview, ask about the individual’s philosophy and worldview in relation to the ethical dilemma of your choosing, which was:

Dilemma 3: Voluntary/Assisted Euthanasia Confronting Death: Who Chooses? Who Controls? A Dialogue between Dax Cowart and Robert Burt http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/706/

The Terry Schiavo Documentary http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cki55BM42kw
Individually, you will need to interview all 4 (four) different individuals and perspectives to complete Part Three of the Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma assignment.

Make sure all roles are covered.

Craft a 250-500-word summary of the individual’s response, including the individual’s identified philosophy and worldview.

APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected