Tag Archives: nevada bcba license

Grand Canyon – NRS 437V Week 5 Assignment Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma (Part Two)

NRS 437V Entire Course Grand Canyon

NRS437V

Week 1 DQ 1

Many situations can raise ethical concerns, particularly in the face of disagreement and conflict between parties. However, not all situations of an ethical nature result in values conflict or constitute an ethical dilemma. Explain the characteristics of an ethical dilemma. How do they differ from other situations resulting in disagreement between conflicting preferences, needs, or expectations?

Week 1 DQ 2

Consider the age-old tale of the father who stole a loaf of bread to feed his hungry family. Stealing is deemed wrong by our society and is punishable by law. Failing to provide for one’s family is neglectful and fundamentally wrong. What would be the dilemma and the implications of such a crime on the individual, the family, the community, and society?

NRS 437V Week 1 Assignment My Nursing Ethics

After reading the Topic 1 materials, complete the questionnaire titled, “My Nursing Ethic.”
Complete the questions below:

PASSION: Why am I here?
MOTIVATION: What moves me to act?
INSPIRATION: What keeps me in motion?
LOYALTY: Whom do I serve?

Using the reading and the questionnaire, write a paper of 750-1,000 words in which you describe your professional moral compass. As you write your paper, include the following:
What personal, cultural, and spiritual values contribute to your worldview and philosophy of nursing? How do these values shape or influence your nursing practice?
Define values, morals, and ethics in the context of your obligation to nursing practice. Explain how your personal values, philosophy, and worldview may conflict with your obligation to practice, creating an ethical dilemma.

Reflect and share your own personal thoughts regarding the morals and ethical dilemmas you may face in the health care field. How do your personal views affect your behavior and your decision making?
Do not be concerned with the use of ethical terminology for this paper.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center

Week 2 DQ 1

How do personal values, morals, and ethics influence decision making? (Consider your upbringing, your family structure, your socioeconomic status, your community, and your own personal experiences). How do these factors influence your decisions? How might they conflict with the needs, preferences, and biases of your patients and their families? Which ethical theoretical framework best describes your personal worldview? Support your response with examples.

Week 2 DQ 2

Read the assigned article, “Dealing With Futile Treatment: A Medical Student’s Perspective.” How does the author describe futile treatment? What ethical dilemmas are faced by health care providers who must address human suffering? How can ethical principles be used to identify the most appropriate decision when conflict arises?

What ethical dilemmas are faced by health care providers who must address human suffering?
How can ethical principles be used to identify the most appropriate decision when conflict arises?

Week 3 DQ 1

Uustal (1993) proposed a decision-making model that provides concrete steps in which to arrive at a morally acceptable solution when faced with an ethical dilemma. What type of an ethical dilemma have you encountered in the clinical setting? How can the decision-making model identified by Uustal be applied to this situation? Be specific when describing each of the nine steps.

Week 3 DQ 2

How do a nurse’s fundamental duties, as described by the Hippocratic Oath and Nightingale Pledge, influence a nurse’s practice and decision making?

NRS 437V Week 3 Assignment Applying Ethical Frameworks in Practice

Details:

Using the steps outlined in the decision-making models in your readings, select one ethical decision-making model and use the model to analyze the case provided.

Case Scenario:

A 6-year-old develops a high fever accompanied by violent vomiting and convulsions while at school. The child is rushed to a nearby hospital. The attending physician makes a diagnosis of meningitis and requests permission to initiate treatment from the parents. The child’s parents are divorced. The mother, who is not the biological parent of the child, has primary custody. She is a Christian Scientist who insists that no medical treatment be offered for religious reasons. The biological father, who resides in another state, is also contacted. He insists that treatment be given and seeks independent consultation from another physician.

Assignment:
In a formal, written paper of 800-1,200 words, answer the following questions:
1. What is the ethical dilemma here?
2. Describe the decision-making model you selected from your readings.
3. How would you resolve this dilemma using the model?
4. Include, at the end of your paper, a 200-word dialog in which you explain your decision to the family. (Remember to use language that the family would understand).

A minimum of three references must be used.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.

Week 4 DQ 1

Does the principle of autonomy guarantee a person the right to do something that is harmful to oneself? To others? Explain your response with ethical rationale.

Week 4 DQ 2

What is the difference between beneficence and nonmaleficence? Give examples of each from your clinical practice.

NRS 437V Week 4 assingment Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma (Part One)

Details:

Refer to the “Collaborative Learning Community: Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma” resource for the dilemmas and resources that will be used for this multi-part Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma assignment. Part ONE is an individual assignment that will also be used in Part TWO, the culminating paper.
For this individual assignment, interview a hospital administrator, a spiritual leader, a health care colleague, or a neighbor/friend.
In your interview, ask about the individual’s philosophy and worldview in relation to the ethical dilemma of your choosing, which was:
Dilemma 3: Voluntary/Assisted Euthanasia Confronting Death: Who Chooses? Who Controls? A Dialogue between Dax Cowart and Robert Burt http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/706/

The Terry Schiavo Documentary http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cki55BM42kw
Individually, you will need to interview all 4 (four) different individuals and perspectives to complete Part Three of the Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma assignment.
Make sure all roles are covered.
Craft a 250-500-word summary of the individual’s response, including the individual’s identified philosophy and worldview.

APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected

Week 5 DQ 1

What is the ethical dilemma?
What is your value and ethical position related to the case? Include discussion of theory and principles on which your position is based.
What are some other alternatives for resolving the problem?
What are the possible consequences for those acceptable alternatives?
How would you prioritize the acceptable alternatives?
What is your plan of action?

Week 5 DQ 1

Health care providers are obligated to provide for those entrusted in their care. To what extent do they meet this obligation? How might their obligation to others conflict with their obligation to themselves?

NRS 437V Week 5 Assignment Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma (Part Two)

Details:

This is a CLC assignment.
Refer to the “Collaborative Learning Community: Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma” resource for the dilemmas and resources that will be used for this multi-part assignment.
After completing the individual interviews (Part ONE), share your interview results. Consider the responses of the four types of individuals interviewed. Assess their similarities and differences.
Compose a written recommendation of 750-1,000 words. Incorporate the research YOU HAVE done as well as your interview results for the four types of individuals to come to a resolution to the ethical dilemma. Be sure to clearly articulate your position and the rationale for your position.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

NRS 437V Week 5 Assignment Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma (Part Three)

This is a CLC assignment.
Refer to the “Collaborative Learning Community: Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma” resource for the dilemmas and resources that will be used for this multi-part assignment.

After completing the individual interviews (Part Two), share your interview results. As a group, consider the responses of the four types of individuals interviewed. Assess their similarities and differences.
Compose a written recommendation of 750-1,000 words. Incorporate the research your group has done as well as your interview results for the four types of individuals to come to a resolution to the ethical dilemma. Be sure to clearly articulate your group’s position and the rationale for your position.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

NRS 437V All Week Discussions Solutions

NRS437V

Week 1 DQ 1

Many situations can raise ethical concerns, particularly in the face of disagreement and conflict between parties. However, not all situations of an ethical nature result in values conflict or constitute an ethical dilemma. Explain the characteristics of an ethical dilemma. How do they differ from other situations resulting in disagreement between conflicting preferences, needs, or expectations?

Week 1 DQ 2

Consider the age-old tale of the father who stole a loaf of bread to feed his hungry family. Stealing is deemed wrong by our society and is
punishable by law. Failing to provide for one’s family is neglectful and fundamentally wrong. What would be the dilemma and the implications of such a crime on the individual, the family, the community, and society?

Week 2 DQ 1

How do personal values, morals, and ethics influence decision making? (Consider your upbringing, your family structure, your
socioeconomic status, your community, and your own personal experiences).

How do these factors influence your decisions?

How might they conflict with the needs, preferences, and biases of your patients and their families?

Which ethical theoretical framework best describes your personal worldview? Support your response with examples.

Week 2 DQ 2

Read the assigned article, “Dealing With Futile Treatment: A Medical Student’s Perspective.” How does the author describe
futile treatment?

What ethical dilemmas are faced by health care providers who must address human suffering?

How can ethical principles be used to identify the most appropriate decision when conflict arises?

What ethical dilemmas are faced by health care providers who must address human suffering?

How can ethical principles be used to identify the most appropriate decision when conflict arises?

Week 3 DQ 1

Uustal (1993) proposed a decision-making model that provides concrete steps in which to arrive at a morally acceptable solution when faced with an ethical dilemma. What type of an ethical dilemma have you encountered in the clinical setting? How can the decision-making model identified by Uustal be applied to this situation? Be specific when describing each of the nine steps.

Week 3 DQ 2

How do a nurse’s fundamental duties, as described by the Hippocratic Oath and Nightingale Pledge, influence a nurse’s practice and
decision making?

Week 4 DQ 1

Does the principle of autonomy guarantee a person the right to do something that is harmful to oneself? To others? Explain your response
with ethical rationale.

Week 4 DQ 2

What is the difference between beneficence and nonmaleficence? Give examples of each from your clinical practice.

Week 5 DQ 1

What is the ethical dilemma?
What is your value and ethical position related to the case?
Include discussion of theory and principles on which your position is based.
What are some other alternatives for resolving the problem?
What are the possible consequences for those acceptable alternatives?
How would you prioritize the acceptable alternatives?
What is your plan of action?

Week 5 DQ 1

Health care providers are obligated to provide for those entrusted in their care. To what extent do they meet this obligation? How might
their obligation to others conflict with their obligation to themselves?

NRS 437V Week 5 Assignment Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma (Part Three)

NRS 437V All Week Assignment Solutions

NRS437V

NRS 437V Week 1 Assignment My Nursing Ethics

After reading the Topic 1 materials, complete the questionnaire titled, “My Nursing Ethic.”

Complete the questions below:

PASSION: Why am I here?
MOTIVATION: What moves me to act?
INSPIRATION: What keeps me in motion?
LOYALTY: Whom do I serve?

Using the reading and the questionnaire, write a paper of 750-1,000 words in which you describe your professional moral compass. As you
write your paper, include the following:

What personal, cultural, and spiritual values contribute to your worldview and philosophy of nursing? How do these values shape or
influence your nursing practice?

Define values, morals, and ethics in the context of your obligation to nursing practice. Explain how your personal values, philosophy,
and worldview may conflict with your obligation to practice, creating an ethical dilemma.

Reflect and share your own personal thoughts regarding the morals and ethical dilemmas you may face in the health care field. How do your personal views affect your behavior and your decision making?

Do not be concerned with the use of ethical terminology for this paper.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An
abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for
successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.
Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center

NRS 437V Week 3 Assignment Applying Ethical Frameworks in Practice

Details:

Using the steps outlined in the decision-making models in your readings, select one ethical decision-making model and use the model to
analyze the case provided.

Case Scenario:

A 6-year-old develops a high fever accompanied by violent vomiting and convulsions while at school. The child is rushed to a nearby
hospital. The attending physician makes a diagnosis of meningitis and requests permission to initiate treatment from the parents. The child’s parents are divorced. The mother, who is not the biological parent of the child, has primary custody. She is a Christian Scientist who insists that no medical treatment be offered for religious reasons. The biological father, who resides in another state, is also contacted. He insists that treatment be given and seeks independent consultation from another physician.

Assignment:

In a formal, written paper of 800-1,200 words, answer the following questions:
1. What is the ethical dilemma here?
2. Describe the decision-making model you selected from your readings.
3. How would you resolve this dilemma using the model?
4. Include, at the end of your paper, a 200-word dialog in which you explain your decision to the family. (Remember to use language that the family would understand).

A minimum of three references must be used.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An
abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for
successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.
Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.

NRS 437V Week 4 assignment Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma (Part One)

Details:

Refer to the “Collaborative Learning Community:
Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma” resource for the dilemmas and resources that will be used for this multi-part Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma assignment. Part ONE is an individual assignment that will also be used in Part TWO, the culminating paper.

For this individual assignment, interview a hospital administrator, a spiritual leader, a health care colleague, or a neighbor/friend.
In your interview, ask about the individual’s philosophy and worldview in relation to the ethical dilemma of your choosing, which was:

Dilemma 3: Voluntary/Assisted Euthanasia Confronting Death: Who Chooses? Who Controls? A Dialogue between Dax Cowart and Robert Burt http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/706/
The Terry Schiavo Documentary http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cki55BM42kw

Individually, you will need to interview all 4 (four) different individuals and perspectives to complete Part Three of the Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma assignment.

Make sure all roles are covered.
Craft a 250-500-word summary of the individual’s response, including the individual’s identified philosophy and worldview.
APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected

NRS 437V Week 5 Assignment Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma (Part Two)

Details:

This is a CLC assignment.
Refer to the “Collaborative Learning Community:
Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma” resource for the dilemmas and resources that will be used for this multi-part assignment.

After completing the individual interviews (Part ONE), share your interview results. Consider the responses of the four types of individuals
interviewed. Assess their similarities and differences.

Compose a written recommendation of 750-1,000 words.
Incorporate the research YOU HAVE done as well as your interview results for the four types of individuals to come to a resolution to the ethical dilemma.
Be sure to clearly articulate your position and the rationale for your position.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An
abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for
successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

NRS 437V Week 5 Assignment Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma (Part Three)

This is a CLC assignment.

Refer to the “Collaborative Learning Community:
Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma” resource for the dilemmas and resources that will be used for this multi-part assignment.

After completing the individual interviews (Part Two), share your interview results. As a group, consider the responses of the four types of
individuals interviewed. Assess their similarities and differences.

Compose a written recommendation of 750-1,000 words.
Incorporate the research your group has done as well as your interview results for the four types of individuals to come to a resolution to the ethical dilemma. Be sure to clearly articulate your group’s position and the rationale for your position.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for
successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.
Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

NRS 437V Week 5 Assignment Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma

NRS 437V Week 5 Complete

NRS437V

Week 5 DQ 1

What is the ethical dilemma?
What is your value and ethical position related to the case?
Include discussion of theory and principles on which your position is based.
What are some other alternatives for resolving the problem?
What are the possible consequences for those acceptable alternatives?
How would you prioritize the acceptable alternatives?
What is your plan of action?

Week 5 DQ 1

Health care providers are obligated to provide for those entrusted in their care. To what extent do they meet this obligation? How might
their obligation to others conflict with their obligation to themselves?

NRS 437V Week 5 Assignment Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma (Part Two)

Details:

This is a CLC assignment.

Refer to the “Collaborative Learning Community:
Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma” resource for the dilemmas and resources that will be used for this multi-part assignment.
After completing the individual interviews (Part ONE), share your interview results. Consider the responses of the four types of individuals
interviewed. Assess their similarities and differences.
Compose a written recommendation of 750-1,000 words.
Incorporate the research YOU HAVE done as well as your interview results for the four types of individuals to come to a resolution to the ethical dilemma.
Be sure to clearly articulate your position and the rationale for your position.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

NRS 437V Week 5  Assignment Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma (Part Three)

This is a CLC assignment.

Refer to the “Collaborative Learning Community:
Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma” resource for the dilemmas and resources that will be used for this multi-part assignment.

After completing the individual interviews (Part Two), share your interview results. As a group, consider the responses of the four types of individuals interviewed. Assess their similarities and differences.

Compose a written recommendation of 750-1,000 words.
Incorporate the research your group has done as well as your interview results for the four types of individuals to come to a resolution to the ethical dilemma. Be sure to clearly articulate your group’s position and the rationale for your position.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for
successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.
Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

NRS 437V Week 4 Assignment Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma (Part One)

NRS 437V Week 4 Complete

NRS437V

Week 4 DQ 1

Does the principle of autonomy guarantee a person the right to do something that is harmful to oneself? To others? Explain your response
with ethical rationale.

Week 4 DQ 2

What is the difference between beneficence and nonmaleficence? Give examples of each from your clinical practice.

NRS 437V Week 4 Assignment Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma (Part One)

Details:

Refer to the “Collaborative Learning Community:
Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma” resource for the dilemmas and resources that will be used for this multi-part Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma assignment. Part ONE is an individual assignment that will also be used in Part TWO, the culminating paper.

For this individual assignment, interview a hospital administrator, a spiritual leader, a health care colleague, or a neighbor/friend.
In your interview, ask about the individual’s philosophy and worldview in relation to the ethical dilemma of your choosing, which was:

Dilemma 3: Voluntary/Assisted Euthanasia Confronting Death: Who Chooses? Who Controls? A Dialogue between Dax Cowart and Robert Burt http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/706/

The Terry Schiavo Documentary http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cki55BM42kw
Individually, you will need to interview all 4 (four) different individuals and perspectives to complete Part Three of the Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma assignment.

Make sure all roles are covered.

Craft a 250-500-word summary of the individual’s response, including the individual’s identified philosophy and worldview.

APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected

NRS 437V Week 3 Assignment Applying Ethical Frameworks in Practice

NRS 437V Week 2 and 3 Complete

NRS437V Week 2 DQ 1

How do personal values, morals, and ethics influence decision making? (Consider your upbringing, your family structure, your
socioeconomic status, your community, and your own personal experiences).

How do these factors influence your decisions?

How might they conflict with the needs, preferences, and biases of your patients and their families?

Which ethical theoretical framework best describes your personal worldview?

Support your response with examples.

NRS437V Week 2 DQ 2

Read the assigned article, “Dealing With Futile Treatment: A Medical Student’s Perspective.”

How does the author describe futile treatment?

What ethical dilemmas are faced by health care providers who must address human suffering?

How can ethical principles be used to identify the most appropriate decision when conflict arises?

What ethical dilemmas are faced by health care providers who must address human suffering?

How can ethical principles be used to identify the most appropriate decision when conflict arises?

Week 3 DQ 1

Uustal (1993) proposed a decision-making model that provides concrete steps in which to arrive at a morally acceptable solution when faced with an ethical dilemma.

What type of an ethical dilemma have you encountered in the clinical setting?

How can the decision-making model identified by Uustal be applied to this situation? Be specific when describing each of the nine steps.

Week 3 DQ 2

How do a nurse’s fundamental duties, as described by the Hippocratic Oath and Nightingale Pledge, influence a nurse’s practice and
decision making?

NRS 437V Week 3 Assignment Applying Ethical Frameworks in Practice

Details:

Using the steps outlined in the decision-making models in your readings, select one ethical decision-making model and use the model to
analyze the case provided.

Case Scenario:

A 6-year-old develops a high fever accompanied by violent vomiting and convulsions while at school. The child is rushed to a nearby
hospital. The attending physician makes a diagnosis of meningitis and requests permission to initiate treatment from the parents. The child’s parents are divorced. The mother, who is not the biological parent of the child, has primary custody. She is a Christian Scientist who insists that no medical treatment be offered for religious reasons. The biological father, who resides in another state, is also contacted. He insists that treatment be given and seeks independent consultation from another physician.

Assignment:

In a formal, written paper of 800-1,200 words, answer the following questions:

1. What is the ethical dilemma here?

2. Describe the decision-making model you selected from your readings.

3. How would you resolve this dilemma using the model?

4. Include, at the end of your paper, a 200-word dialog in which you explain your decision to the family. (Remember to use language that the family would understand).

A minimum of three references must be used.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An
abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for
successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.
Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Only Word
documents can be submitted to Turnitin.

NRS 437V Week 1 Assignment My Nursing Ethics

NRS 437V Week 1 Complete

NRS437V

Week 1 DQ 1

Many situations can raise ethical concerns, particularly in the face of disagreement and conflict between parties. However, not all situations of an ethical nature result in values conflict or constitute an ethical dilemma. Explain the characteristics of an ethical dilemma. How do they differ from other situations resulting in disagreement between conflicting preferences, needs, or expectations?

Week 1 DQ 2

Consider the age-old tale of the father who stole a loaf of bread to feed his hungry family. Stealing is deemed wrong by our society and is
punishable by law. Failing to provide for one’s family is neglectful and fundamentally wrong. What would be the dilemma and the implications of such a crime on the individual, the family, the community, and society?

NRS 437V Week 1 Assignment My Nursing Ethics

After reading the Topic 1 materials, complete the questionnaire titled, “My Nursing Ethic.”

Complete the questions below:

PASSION: Why am I here?
MOTIVATION: What moves me to act?
INSPIRATION: What keeps me in motion?
LOYALTY: Whom do I serve?

Using the reading and the questionnaire, write a paper of 750-1,000 words in which you describe your professional moral compass. As you
write your paper, include the following:

What personal, cultural, and spiritual values contribute to your worldview and philosophy of nursing? How do these values shape or
influence your nursing practice?

Define values, morals, and ethics in the context of your obligation to nursing practice. Explain how your personal values, philosophy,
and worldview may conflict with your obligation to practice, creating an ethical dilemma.

Reflect and share your own personal thoughts regarding the morals and ethical dilemmas you may face in the health care field. How do your personal views affect your behavior and your decision making?

Do not be concerned with the use of ethical terminology for this paper.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An
abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for
successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.
Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center

NRS 410V Grand Canyon All Week Assignments

NRS410V

NRS 410 Grand Canyon Week 2 Assignment Latest

Details:

Write a paper (1,250-1,750 words) describing the approach to care of cancer. In addition, include the following
in your paper:

1. Describe the diagnosis and staging of cancer.
   
2. Describe at least three complications of cancer, the side effects of treatment, and methods to lessen physical and psychological effects.
3. Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
   

This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.

NRS 410 Grand Canyon Week 3 Case Study 1 Assignment Latest

Details: In a short essay (500-750 words), answer the Question at the end of Case Study 1. Cite references to support your
positions.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

Case Study 1

Ms. A. is an apparently healthy 26-year-old white woman. Since the beginning of the current golf season, Ms. A has noted increased shortness of breath and low levels of energy and enthusiasm. These symptoms seem worse during her menses. Today, while playing in a golf tournament at a high, mountainous course, she became light-headed and was taken by her golfing partner to the emergency clinic. The attending physician’s notes indicated a temperature of 98 degrees F, an elevated heart rate and respiratory rate, and low blood pressure. Ms. A states, “Menorrhagia and dysmenorrheal have been a problem for 10-12 years, and I take 1,000 mg of aspirin every 3 to 4 hours for 6 days during menstruation.”
During the summer months, while playing golf, she also takes aspirin to avoid “stiffness in my joints.”

Laboratory values are as follows:
Hemoglobin = 8 g/dl
Hematocrit = 32%
Erythrocyte count = 3.1 x 10/mm
RBC smear showed microcytic and
hypochromic cells Reticulocyte count = 1.5%

Other laboratory values were within normal limits. Question

Considering the circumstances and the preliminary workup, what type of anemia does Ms. A most likely have? In an essay of 500-750 words, explain your answer and include rationale.

NRS 410 Grand Canyon Week 3 Case Study 2 Assignment Latest

Details:

In a short essay (500-750 words), answer the question at the end of Case Study 2. Cite references to support your positions.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

Case Study 2

Mr. P is a 76-year-old male with cardiomyopathy and congestive heart failure who has been hospitalized frequently to treat CHF symptoms. He has difficulty maintaining diet restrictions and managing his polypharmacy. He has 4+ pitting edema, moist crackles throughout lung fields, and labored breathing. He has no family other than his wife, who verbalizes sadness over his declining health and over her inability to get out of the house. She is overwhelmed with the stack of medical bills, as Mr. P always took care of the financial issues. Mr. P is despondent and asks why God has not taken him.

Question

Considering Mr. P’s condition and circumstance, write an essay of 500-750 words that includes the following:

• Describe your approach to care.
  
• Recommend a treatment plan.
  
• Describe a method for providing both the patient and family with education and explain your rationale.
• Provide a teaching plan (avoid using terminology that the patient and family may not understand).
  

NRS 410 Grand Canyon Week 4 Assignment Latest

Details:

This is a CLC assignment.

As a group, observe the simulated “Home Visit With Sallie Mae Fisher” video (.gcumedia.com/zwebassets/courseMaterialPages/nrs410v_vp01Alt.php” title=”http://lc.gcumedia.com/zwebassets/courseMaterialPages/nrs410v_vp01Alt.php“>

http://lc.gcumedia.com/zwebassets/courseMaterialPages/nrs410v_vp01Alt.php).

Refer to “Sallie Mae Fisher’s Health History and Discharge Orders” for specifics related to the case study used to inform the assignment.

Using “Home Visit With Sallie Mae Fisher” and “Sallie Mae Fisher’s Health History and Discharge Orders,” complete the following components of this assignment: Essay Portion

After viewing the home visit, write an essay of 500-750-words in which you do the following:

1. Identify, prioritize, and describe at least four problems.
   
2. Provide substantiating evidence (assessment data) for each problem identified.
3. Identify and describe at least four medical and/or nursing interventions.
4. Discuss your rationale for the interventions identified.

Prepare this step of the assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. Scripted Dialogue Portion Utilizing the information learned from the home visit, health histories, and discharge orders, write a scripted dialogue in which you provide Sallie Mae with education that describes her problems and the interventions identified to improve her condition. Consider Sallie Mae’s physiological, psychosocial, educational, and spiritual needs when
developing your dialogue.

Your dialogue should resemble a script. The following is an example of a few sentences from a scripted dialogue:

Nurse: “Good morning, Salle Mae, my name is and I will be your nurse today. I understand you are experiencing problems with APA format is not required for this part of the assignment, but solid academic writing is expected.

Refer to “Home Visit With Sallie Mae Fisher Grading Criteria.”

Entire Assignment

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin. Sallie Mae Fisher’s Health History and Discharge Orders

Sallie Mae Fisher Health History

Ms. Fisher is an 82-year-old female with a history of chronic congestive heart failure (CHF), atrial fibrillation, and hypertension . During the last 6 months, she has been hospitalized four times for exacerbation of her CHF. She was discharged home last Saturday from the hospital after a 3-day stay to treat increased dyspnea, an 8-pound weight gain, and chest pain.

Ms. Fisher is recently widowed and lives alone. She has a daughter, Thelma Jean, who lives in town but works full time and has family issues of her own. Therefore, family support is limited.

Hospital Discharge Instructions

• Mountain Top Home Health to evaluate cardio-pulmonary status, medication management, and home safety.
  
• Medical Equipment Company to deliver oxygen concentrator and instruct patient in use. 0, at 2 liters per nasal prongs PRN.
  
• Prescriptions given at discharge: o Digoxin 0.25 mg once a day o Lasix 80 mg twice a day Calan 240 mg once a day
• Order written to continue other home meds.

Sallie Mae’s Home Medication List

• Zocar 50 mg once a day
  
• Minipres 1 mg once a day
  
• Vasotec 10 mg twice a day
  
• Prilosec 20 mg once a day
• Furosemide 40 mg once a day
  
• Effexor 37.5 mg at bedtime
  
• Lanoxin 0.125 mg every other day
  
• Multivitamin once a day
  
• Potassium 40 mEq once a day
  
• Ibuprofen 400 mg q 4 hours as needed for pain
  
• Darvocet N 100 mg q 4 hours as needed for pain
  
• Nitroglycerin ointment, apply 1 inch every day

NRS 410 Grand Canyon Week 5 Assignment Latest

Details:

Identify a research or evidence-based article that focuses comprehensively on a specific intervention or new diagnostic tool for the treatment of diabetes in adults or children.

In a paper of 750-1,000 words, summarize the main idea of the research findings for a specific patient population. Research must include clinical findings that are current, thorough, and relevant to diabetes and the nursing practice.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin. Details:

Based on the summary of research findings identified from the Evidence-Based Project-Paper on Diabetes that describes a new diagnostic tool or intervention for the treatment of diabetes in adults or children, complete the following components of this assignment:

Develop a PowerPoint presentation (a title slide, 6-12 slides, and a reference slide; no larger than 2 MB) that includes the following:

1. A brief summary of the research conducted in the Evidence-Based Project – Paper on Diabetes.
   
2. A descriptive and reflective discussion of how the new tool or intervention may be integrated into practice that is supported by sound research.

While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin, unless othenvise directed by your instructor. If so directed, refer to the Student Success Center for directions. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.

Benchmark Assignment: Evidence-Based Practice Project—Paper on Diabetes

1 Unsatisfactory 0-71% 0.00%

2 Less Than Satisfactory 72-75% 75.00